Employing similarity to highlight differences: On the impact of anatomical assumptions in chest X-ray registration methods
Astrid Berg, Eva Vandersmissen, Maria Wimmer, David Major, Theresa, Neubauer, Dimitrios Lenis, Jeroen Cant, Annemiek Snoeckx, Katja B\"uhler

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel rib-based anatomical registration method for chest X-ray comparison, improving the detection of pathological changes by reducing unnatural deformations and increasing rib overlap.
Contribution
It proposes a new anatomy-penalized registration approach using rib segmentation, outperforming existing methods in preserving anatomical structures and highlighting pathological differences.
Findings
Reduced warp field folding to 1/6 of previous methods
Increased rib overlap by over 25%
Enhanced detection of overlooked pathological changes
Abstract
To facilitate both the detection and the interpretation of findings in chest X-rays, comparison with a previous image of the same patient is very valuable to radiologists. Today, the most common approach for deep learning methods to automatically inspect chest X-rays disregards the patient history and classifies only single images as normal or abnormal. Nevertheless, several methods for assisting in the task of comparison through image registration have been proposed in the past. However, as we illustrate, they tend to miss specific types of pathological changes like cardiomegaly and effusion. Due to assumptions on fixed anatomical structures or their measurements of registration quality, they produce unnaturally deformed warp fields impacting visualization of differences between moving and fixed images. We aim to overcome these limitations, through a new paradigm based on individual…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
