Laboratory study of the failed torus mechanism in arched, line-tied, magnetic flux ropes

TL;DR

This study investigates the failed torus mechanism in magnetic flux ropes through laboratory experiments, revealing the role of ideal MHD effects and proposing a new model to explain the energy redistribution during failed eruptions.

Contribution

The paper introduces new diagnostics and a model that explain the failed torus events without relying on Taylor relaxation, enhancing understanding of MFR stability.

Findings

Ideal MHD effects explain energy redistribution in failed torus events.

Taylor relaxation is not the mechanism for current redistribution during failures.

A new model involving non-ideal effects above electrodes accounts for observed phenomena.

Abstract

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are some of the most energetic and violent events in our solar system. The prediction and understanding of CMEs is of particular importance due to the impact that they can have on Earth-based satellite systems, and in extreme cases, ground-based electronics. CMEs often occur when long-lived magnetic flux ropes (MFRs) anchored to the solar surface destabilize and erupt away from the Sun. One potential cause for these eruptions is an ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instability such as the kink or torus instability. Previous experiments on the Magnetic Reconnection eXperiment (MRX) revealed a class of MFRs that were torus-unstable but kink-stable, which failed to erupt. These "failed-tori" went through a process similar to Taylor relaxation where the toroidal current was redistributed before the eruption ultimately failed. We have investigated this behavior through additional diagnostics that measure the current distribution at the foot points and the energy distribution before and after an event. These measurements indicate that ideal MHD effects are sufficient to explain the energy distribution changes during failed torus events. This excludes Taylor relaxation as a possible mechanism of current redistribution during an event. A new model that only requires non-ideal effects in a thin layer above the electrodes is presented to explain the observed phenomena. This work broadens our understanding of the stability of MFRs and the mechanism behind the failed torus through the improved prediction of the torus instability and through new diagnostics to measure the energy inventory and current profile at the foot points.