Overcoming Separation Between Counterparts Due to Unknown Proper Motions in Catalogue Cross-Matching
Tom J. Wilson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a probabilistic model for stellar proper motions to improve catalogue cross-matching accuracy, especially for sources lacking precise motion data, by integrating motion uncertainties into Bayesian matching frameworks.
Contribution
It develops a statistical model for on-sky motions and demonstrates how to incorporate it into Bayesian cross-matching methods, enhancing match reliability.
Findings
Improved matching accuracy for sources with unknown proper motions.
Reduced false match rates in photometric catalogue cross-identification.
Enhanced recovery of red objects across optical-infrared surveys.
Abstract
To perform precise and accurate photometric catalogue cross-matches -- assigning counterparts between two separate datasets -- we need to describe all possible sources of uncertainty in object position. With ever-increasing time baselines between observations, like 2MASS in 2001 and the next generation of surveys, such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's LSST, Euclid, and the Nancy Grace Roman telescope, it is crucial that we can robustly describe and model the effects of stellar motions on source positions in photometric catalogues. While Gaia has revolutionised astronomy with its high-precision astrometry, it will only provide motions for ~10% of LSST sources; additionally, LSST itself will not be able to provide high-quality motion information for sources below its single-visit depth, and other surveys may measure no motions at all. This leaves large numbers of objects with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
