Optimal Transport for Counterfactual Estimation: A Method for Causal Inference
Arthur Charpentier, Emmanuel Flachaire, Ewen Gallic

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel causal inference method using optimal transport to estimate the impact of variables on individual outcomes, especially when traditional average effects are insufficient.
Contribution
It proposes a new approach for conditional causal effect estimation using optimal transport, extending to higher dimensions for personalized causal analysis.
Findings
Effective in estimating individual treatment effects.
Applicable to high-dimensional covariate spaces.
Demonstrated on birth outcome data.
Abstract
Many problems ask a question that can be formulated as a causal question: "what would have happened if...?" For example, "would the person have had surgery if he or she had been Black?" To address this kind of questions, calculating an average treatment effect (ATE) is often uninformative, because one would like to know how much impact a variable (such as skin color) has on a specific individual, characterized by certain covariates. Trying to calculate a conditional ATE (CATE) seems more appropriate. In causal inference, the propensity score approach assumes that the treatment is influenced by x, a collection of covariates. Here, we will have the dual view: doing an intervention, or changing the treatment (even just hypothetically, in a thought experiment, for example by asking what would have happened if a person had been Black) can have an impact on the values of x. We will see here…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
MethodsTest
