Significance of anonymity and privacy in improving inclusivity and diversity in Higher Education Learning Environments
Poonam Yadav

TL;DR
This study explores how anonymity and privacy in online interactions can enhance inclusivity and diversity in higher education, especially in Computer Science, by analyzing student and lecturer perspectives through interviews and questionnaires.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that anonymity and privacy significantly improve student participation and inclusivity in higher education learning environments.
Findings
Students prefer anonymous online surveys and evaluations.
A gap exists between preferred and actual communication methods.
Anonymity and privacy support diversity and inclusivity.
Abstract
Interactions between lecturers and students are the key to learning in the higher education environment. In this paper, the investigation pursues two different contexts to understand these interactions and the impact of anonymity and privacy in different interactions in the Computer Science (CS) department. The first context "different interaction between a lecturer and students" is investigated using phenomenological research approach by interviewing lecturer in CS (). The second context "the significance of anonymity and privacy in interactions" is investigated using a quantitative and qualitative questionnaire-based research method using an online student questionnaire (). The study finds a large gap between students' perception of preferred communication methods and the use of the same communication method. From the second context study, it is evident that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGender and Technology in Education · Social Media and Politics · Online Learning and Analytics
