No evidence for synchronization of the solar cycle by a "clock"
E. Weisshaar, R. H. Cameron, M. Sch\"ussler

TL;DR
This study rigorously tests whether the solar cycle phases are synchronized by a precise clock or behave as a random walk, finding evidence against synchronization and supporting models with stochastic phase fluctuations.
Contribution
The paper provides the first comprehensive statistical analysis rejecting phase synchronization of the solar cycle, favoring randomly perturbed dynamo models.
Findings
Synchronization rejected at 95-99% significance levels.
Phases exhibit properties consistent with a random walk.
Supports models with little inter-cycle memory.
Abstract
The length of the solar activity cycle fluctuates considerably. The temporal evolution of the corresponding cycle phase, that is, the deviation of the epochs of activity minima or maxima from strict periodicity, provides relevant information concerning the physical mechanism underlying the cyclic magnetic activity. An underlying strictly periodic process (akin to a perfect "clock"), with the observer seeing a superposition of the perfect clock and a small random phase perturbation, leads to long-term phase stability in the observations. Such behavior would be expected if cycles were synchronized by tides caused by orbiting planets or by a hypothetical torsional oscillation in the solar radiative interior. Alternatively, in the absence of such synchronization, phase fluctuations accumulate and a random walk of the phase ensues, which is a typical property of randomly perturbed dynamo…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
