Classifying the satellite plane membership of Centaurus A's dwarf galaxies using orbital alignment constraints
Kosuke Jamie Kanehisa, Marcel S. Pawlowski, Oliver M\"uller, Sangmo, Tony Sohn

TL;DR
This study constrains the orbital velocities of Centaurus A's satellite galaxies to determine their membership in a potential co-rotating plane, revealing most satellites are consistent with the plane's rotation despite some being non-members.
Contribution
It introduces a method to classify satellite galaxies' orbital alignment with the Centaurus A plane using kinematic constraints, improving understanding of its structure and dynamics.
Findings
Most satellites are consistent with the plane's rotation within kinematic uncertainties.
Removing non-members increases the significance of the observed velocity trend.
Results are robust across different halo mass estimates and potential models.
Abstract
The flattened, possibly co-rotating plane of satellite galaxies around Centaurus A, if more than a fortuitous alignment, adds to the pre-existing tension between the well-studied Milky Way and M31 planes and the CDM model of structure formation. It was recently reported that the Centaurus A satellite plane (CASP) may be rotationally supported, but a further understanding of the system's kinematics is elusive in the absence of full three-dimensional velocities. We constrain the transverse velocities of 27 satellites that would rotationally stabilise the Centaurus A plane, and classify the satellites by whether their possible orbits are consistent with the CASP. Five satellites are identified to be unlikely to participate in the plane, two of which are clearly non-members. Despite their previously reported line-of-sight velocity trend suggestive of a common co-rotating motion, 17…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
