How multiple weak species jeopardise biodiversity in spatial rock-paper-scissors models
J. Menezes, R. Barbalho

TL;DR
This study investigates how multiple weak species in spatial rock-paper-scissors models affect biodiversity, revealing that spatial arrangement and species positioning influence stability and coexistence.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of multi-species weak interactions in spatial models, highlighting the impact of species positioning on biodiversity stability.
Findings
Spatial organisation determines cyclic game stability.
Adjacent weak species increase biodiversity loss.
Distribution unevenness affects territorial dominance.
Abstract
We study generalised rock-paper-scissors models with an arbitrary odd number N \geq 5 of species, among which n are weak, with 2 \leq n \leq (N-1)/2. Because of the species' weakness, the probability of individuals conquering territory in the cyclic spatial game is low. Running stochastic simulations, we study the role of unevenness in the rock-paper-scissors game in spatial patterns and population dynamics, considering diverse models where the weak species are in different positions in the cyclic game order. Studying systems with five and seven species, we discover that the individuals' spatial organisation arising from the pattern formation process determines the stability of the cyclic game with multiple weak species. Our outcomes show that the presence of species unbalances the spatial distribution of organisms of the same species bringing consequences on territorial dominance, with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Plant and animal studies · Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
