Regional Pooling in Extreme Event Attribution Studies: an Approach Based on Multiple Statistical Testing
Leandra Zanger, Axel B\"ucher, Frank Kreienkamp, Philip Lorenz, and, Jordis Tradowsky

TL;DR
This paper introduces statistical methods for selecting homogeneous locations in spatial extreme event data, improving analysis accuracy through pooling, with practical implementation in an R package.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach using hypothesis testing and bootstrap methods for regional pooling in extreme event attribution, enhancing spatial analysis accuracy.
Findings
Methods accurately identify homogeneous locations
Pooling improves statistical analysis accuracy
Approach validated with a case study on European precipitation extremes
Abstract
Statistical methods are proposed to select homogeneous locations when analyzing spatial block maxima data, such as in extreme event attribution studies. The methods are based on classical hypothesis testing using Wald-type test statistics, with critical values obtained from suitable parametric bootstrap procedures and corrected for multiplicity. A large-scale Monte Carlo simulation study finds that the methods are able to accurately identify homogeneous locations, and that pooling the selected locations improves the accuracy of subsequent statistical analyses. The approach is illustrated with a case study on precipitation extremes in Western Europe. The methods are implemented in an R package that allows easy application in future extreme event attribution studies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
