On the question of the sign of size effects in the elastic behavior of foams

TL;DR

This study uses virtual testing with CT data to investigate size effects on the elastic properties of foam materials, revealing a consistent negative size effect across different deformation modes.

Contribution

It introduces a novel virtual testing approach to study size effects in foam elasticity, avoiding experimental disturbances and providing new insights into size-dependent behavior.

Findings

Consistent negative size effect observed in all deformation modes

Virtual tests align qualitatively with experimental data

Large scatter in apparent moduli across samples

Abstract

Due to their good ratio of stiffness and strength to weight, foam materials find use in lightweight engineering. Though, in many applications like structural bending or tension, the scale separation between macroscopic structure and the foam's mesostructure like cells size, is relatively weak and the mechanical properties of the foam appear to be size dependent. Positive as well as negative size effects have been observed for certain basic tests of foams, i.e., the material appears either to be more compliant or stiffer than would be expected from larger specimens. Performing tests with sufficiently small specimens is challenging as any disturbances from damage of cell walls during sample preparation or from loading devices must be avoided. Correspondingly, the number of respective data in literature is relatively low and the results are partly contradictory. In order to avoid the problems from sample preparation or bearings, the present study employs virtual tests with CT data of real medium-density ceramic foams. A number of samples of different size is "cut" from the resulting voxel data. Subsequently, the apparent elastic properties of each virtual sample are "measured" directly by a free vibrational analysis using finite cell method, thereby avoiding any disturbances from load application or bearings. The results exhibit a large scatter of the apparent moduli per sample size, but with a clear negative size effect in all investigated basic modes of deformation (bending, torsion, uniaxial). Finally, the results are compared qualitatively and quantitatively to available experimental data from literature, yielding common trends as well as open questions.