Much Ado About Gender: Current Practices and Future Recommendations for Appropriate Gender-Aware Information Access
Christine Pinney, Amifa Raj, Alex Hanna, and Michael D. Ekstrand

TL;DR
This paper systematically reviews how gender is used in information retrieval and recommender systems, highlighting prevalent binary assumptions and ethical concerns, and offers recommendations for more responsible practices.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of current gender usage in IR and recommender systems and proposes ethical guidelines for future research and development.
Findings
Most papers do not use explicit gender variables.
Gender is often used for personalization or fairness auditing.
Binary gender assumptions are prevalent despite recognition of gender diversity.
Abstract
Information access research (and development) sometimes makes use of gender, whether to report on the demographics of participants in a user study, as inputs to personalized results or recommendations, or to make systems gender-fair, amongst other purposes. This work makes a variety of assumptions about gender, however, that are not necessarily aligned with current understandings of what gender is, how it should be encoded, and how a gender variable should be ethically used. In this work, we present a systematic review of papers on information retrieval and recommender systems that mention gender in order to document how gender is currently being used in this field. We find that most papers mentioning gender do not use an explicit gender variable, but most of those that do either focus on contextualizing results of model performance, personalizing a system based on assumptions of user…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
