Pragmatic Estimation of Sample Size for Number of Interviews for PRO development in the 2009 FDA PRO guidance
Chris Barker

TL;DR
This paper introduces a statistical methodology to confirm saturation in qualitative patient interviews for PRO development, addressing regulatory concerns and improving the reliability of sample size estimation in clinical trial endpoints.
Contribution
It provides a formal statistical definition of saturation and demonstrates its application using real data, enhancing PRO development for regulatory approval.
Findings
Saturation can occur more than once in interview sequences.
A statistical criterion for confirming saturation is proposed.
Application to real data shows practical utility of the method.
Abstract
PROs developed de novo, using the FDA guidance may involve structured patient interviews or focus groups. Qualitative Research is a methodology for eliciting and coding interviews and produces concepts or themes. These concepts are used to develop items in a PRO for use as an endpoint in Clinical trials. A convention in the field is that interviews and code/concept elicitation are considered complete when subsequent interviews produces "no new concepts" -termed "saturation". FDA reviewers frequently challenge PRO developers whether there are sufficient patient interviews to confirm that saturation is achieved after occurrence of zero new concepts. Several authors have reported that concrete criteria are need for confirming that saturation is achieved (Francis 2010, Mason 2010, Marshall 2013). I provide statistical methodology for confirming saturation, suitable for review by a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
