On the functional form of the radial acceleration relation

TL;DR

This study uses Exhaustive Symbolic Regression to analyze the radial acceleration relation in galaxy data, revealing that the relation's functional form is not definitively MOND-like due to data limitations.

Contribution

It introduces ESR as a prior-free method to explore the RAR's functional form, challenging previous assumptions about its law-like nature.

Findings

Best fits show $g_{obs} eq g_{bar}$ at high accelerations

Deep-MOND limit $g_{obs} o oot{2}rom g_{bar}$ is not evident

Data limitations prevent definitive conclusions about the RAR's form

Abstract

We apply a new method for learning equations from data -- Exhaustive Symbolic Regression (ESR) -- to late-type galaxy dynamics as encapsulated in the radial acceleration relation (RAR). Relating the centripetal acceleration due to baryons, $g_\text{bar}$, to the total dynamical acceleration, $g_\text{obs}$, the RAR has been claimed to manifest a new law of nature due to its regularity and tightness, in agreement with Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND). Fits to this relation have been restricted by prior expectations to particular functional forms, while ESR affords an exhaustive and nearly prior-free search through functional parameter space to identify the equations optimally trading accuracy with simplicity. Working with the SPARC data, we find the best functions typically satisfy $g_\text{obs} \propto g_\text{bar}$ at high $g_\text{bar}$, although the coefficient of proportionality is not clearly unity and the deep-MOND limit $g_\text{obs} \propto \sqrt{g_\text{bar}}$ as $g_\text{bar} \to 0$ is little evident at all. By generating mock data according to MOND with or without the external field effect, we find that symbolic regression would not be expected to identify the generating function or reconstruct successfully the asymptotic slopes. We conclude that the limited dynamical range and significant uncertainties of the SPARC RAR preclude a definitive statement of its functional form, and hence that this data alone can neither demonstrate nor rule out law-like gravitational behaviour.