A Storage-Effective BTB Organization for Servers

TL;DR

This paper introduces BTB-X, a storage-efficient branch target buffer organization that significantly increases branch tracking capacity by storing branch target offsets with variable-sized ways, reducing storage needs.

Contribution

Proposes a novel BTB organization using variable-sized ways to store branch target offsets, greatly enhancing capacity within the same storage budget.

Findings

BTB-X tracks 2.24x more branches than conventional BTBs.

BTB-X outperforms state-of-the-art PDede in branch tracking capacity.

Significant storage reduction achieved without performance loss.

Abstract

Many contemporary applications feature multi-megabyte instruction footprints that overwhelm the capacity of branch target buffers (BTB) and instruction caches (L1-I), causing frequent front-end stalls that inevitably hurt performance. BTB capacity is crucial for performance as a sufficiently large BTB enables the front-end to accurately resolve the upcoming execution path and steer instruction fetch appropriately. Moreover, it also enables highly effective fetch-directed instruction prefetching that can eliminate a large portion L1-I misses. For these reasons, commercial processors allocate vast amounts of storage capacity to BTBs. This work aims to reduce BTB storage requirements by optimizing the organization of BTB entries. Our key insight is that storing branch target offsets, instead of full or compressed targets, can drastically reduce BTB storage cost as the vast majority of dynamic branches have short offsets requiring just a handful of bits to encode. Based on this insight, we size the ways of a set associative BTB to hold different number of target offset bits such that each way stores offsets within a particular range. Doing so enables a dramatic reduction in storage for target addresses. Our final design, called BTB-X, uses an 8-way set associative BTB with differently sized ways that enables it to track about 2.24x more branches than a conventional BTB and 1.3x more branches than a storage-optimized state-of-the-art BTB organization, called PDede, with the same storage budget.