TL;DR
This study rigorously benchmarks nine conformational B-cell epitope prediction tools, revealing their generally poor performance and highlighting the need for improved methods and evaluation standards in the field.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive benchmarking of existing tools on a large dataset and demonstrates their limitations, especially in the context of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Findings
All methods show very low performance.
Consensus strategies are only marginally better than random.
Tools perform poorly on SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Abstract
Accurate in-silico prediction of conformational B-cell epitopes would lead to major improvements in disease diagnostics, drug design and vaccine development. A variety of computational methods, mainly based on machine learning approaches, have been developed in the last decades to tackle this challenging problem. Here, we rigorously benchmarked nine state-of-the-art conformational B-cell epitope prediction webservers, including generic and antibody-specific methods, on a dataset of over 250 antibody-antigen structures. The results of our assessment and statistical analyses show that all the methods achieve very low performances, and some do not perform better than randomly generated patches of surface residues. In addition, we also found that commonly used consensus strategies that combine the results from multiple webservers are at best only marginally better than random. Finally, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
