The impact of human expert visual inspection on the discovery of strong gravitational lenses
Karina Rojas, Thomas E. Collett, Daniel Ballard, Mark R. Magee, Simon, Birrer, Elizabeth Buckley-Geer., James H. H. Chan, Benjamin Cl\'ement, Jos\'e, M. Diego, Fabrizio Gentile, Jimena Gonz\'alez, R\'emy Joseph, Jorge Mastache,, Stefan Schuldt, Crescenzo Tortora, Tom\'as Verdugo

TL;DR
This study evaluates how well human experts can identify strong gravitational lenses in survey images, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and the benefits of team-based classification for reliable candidate selection.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness and limitations of human visual inspection in gravitational lens detection and suggests team classification improves reliability.
Findings
Experts excel at identifying bright, well-resolved Einstein rings.
Detection drops for faint arcs and small Einstein radii.
Team of 6+ classifiers reduces performance variability.
Abstract
We investigate the ability of human 'expert' classifiers to identify strong gravitational lens candidates in Dark Energy Survey like imaging. We recruited a total of 55 people that completed more than 25 of the project. During the classification task, we present to the participants 1489 images. The sample contains a variety of data including lens simulations, real lenses, non-lens examples, and unlabeled data. We find that experts are extremely good at finding bright, well-resolved Einstein rings, whilst arcs with -band signal-to-noise less than 25 or Einstein radii less than 1.2 times the seeing are rarely recovered. Very few non-lenses are scored highly. There is substantial variation in the performance of individual classifiers, but they do not appear to depend on the classifier's experience, confidence or academic position. These variations can be mitigated with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
