Uncertainty Quantification in CT pulmonary angiography
Adwaye M Rambojun, Hend Komber, Jennifer Rossdale, Jay Suntharalingam,, Jonathan C L Rodrigues, Matthias J Ehrhardt, and Audrey Repetti

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian framework for quantifying uncertainty in CT pulmonary angiography images, helping radiologists distinguish true pulmonary embolisms from artifacts, especially under noisy or limited data conditions.
Contribution
The paper presents a scalable hypothesis testing method for CT that quantifies uncertainty of potential pulmonary embolisms using a Bayesian approach.
Findings
Effective in high noise environments
Operates with limited data
Improves PE detection confidence
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the thorax is widely used for the detection and monitoring of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, CT images can contain artifacts due to the acquisition or the processes involved in image reconstruction. Radiologists often have to distinguish between such artifacts and actual PEs. Our main contribution comes in the form of a scalable hypothesis testing method for CT, to enable quantifying uncertainty of possible PEs. In particular, we introduce a Bayesian Framework to quantify the uncertainty of an observed compact structure that can be identified as a PE. We assess the ability of the method to operate under high noise environments and with insufficient data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Flow Measurement and Analysis · Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
