
TL;DR
This paper compares geometric and arithmetic methods for computing algebraic invariants of surface group representation varieties into certain algebraic groups, providing evidence towards a motivic version of Higman's conjecture.
Contribution
It introduces algebraic representatives to efficiently compute TQFT-based invariants and extends computations of E-polynomials to higher dimensions, linking to Higman's conjecture.
Findings
Computed virtual classes in the Grothendieck ring for n=1..5
Calculated E-polynomials for n=1..10
Provided algorithmic methods for both approaches
Abstract
The -representation variety parametrizes the representations of the fundamental groups of surfaces into an algebraic group . Taking to be the groups of upper triangular or unipotent matrices, we compare two methods for computing algebraic invariants of . Using the geometric method initiated by Gonz\'alez-Prieto, Logares and Mu\~noz, based on a Topological Quantum Field Theory (TQFT), we compute the virtual classes of in the Grothendieck ring of varieties for . Introducing the notion of algebraic representatives we are able to efficiently compute the TQFT. Using the arithmetic method initiated by Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas, we compute the -polynomials of for . For both methods, we describe how the computations can be performed algorithmically.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
