Implication Algebras and Implication Semigroups of Binary Relations
Andrew Lewis-Smith Ja\v{s} \v{S}emrl

TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of implication algebras and semigroups of binary relations, establishing decidability results for implication algebras and demonstrating undecidability for implication semigroups.
Contribution
It proves finite axiomatizability and decidability for representable implication algebras and introduces a Stone-style representation theorem, contrasting with the undecidability results for implication semigroups.
Findings
Finite axiomatizability of representable implication algebras
Decidability of the finite representation problem for implication algebras
Undecidability of the representation decision problem for implication semigroups
Abstract
Representable implication algebras are known to be axiomatised by a finite number of equations (making the representation and finite representation problems decidable here). We show that this also holds in the context of unary (and binary) relations and present a Stone-style representation theorem. We then show that the (finite) representation decision problem is undecidable for implication semigroups, in stark contrast with implication algebras.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems · Advanced Algebra and Logic
