Solid phase transitions in the liquid limit
Yury Grabovsky, Lev Truskinovsky

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental differences between solid-solid and liquid-liquid phase transitions using a 2D nonlinear elasticity model, providing bounds on the elastic binodal near the liquid limit without explicit quasiconvex envelope computation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to compare nucleation thresholds in a two-phase material to bound phase transition boundaries near the liquid limit.
Findings
Derived tight bounds on the elastic binodal for the model material.
Compared cooperative and non-cooperative nucleation to understand phase transition limits.
Provided insights into the nature of solid-solid transitions in a near-liquid regime.
Abstract
We address the fundamental difference between solid-solid and liquid-liquid phase transitions within the Ericksen's nonlinear elasticity paradigm. To highlight ideas, we consider the simplest nontrivial 2D problem and work with a prototypical two-phase Hadamard material which allows one to weaken the rigidity and explore the nature of solid-solid phase transitions in a ``near-liquid'' limit. In the language of calculus of variations we probe limits of quasiconvexity in an ``almost liquid'' solid by comparing the thresholds for cooperative (laminate based) and non-cooperative (inclusion based) nucleation. Using these two types of nucleation tests we obtain for our model material surprisingly tight two-sided bounds on the elastic binodal without directly computing the quasiconvex envelope.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMaterial Dynamics and Properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
