FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility
Isa Inuwa-Dutse

TL;DR
This paper explores how AI fairness and ethics can be made more inclusive and culturally sensitive by involving underserved communities in the global South, highlighting biases and proposing community-led solutions.
Contribution
It introduces a community-led approach for collecting representative data and ensuring AI aligns with local social values and FATE needs in underserved regions.
Findings
AI models encode bias and stereotypes
Community participation can improve AI inclusivity
Recommendations based on public input enhance social value alignment
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at the forefront of modern technology, and its effects are felt in many areas of society. To prevent algorithmic disparities, fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in AI are being implemented. However, the current discourse on these issues is largely dominated by more economically developed countries (MEDC), leaving out local knowledge, cultural pluralism, and global fairness. This study aims to address this gap by examining FATE-related desiderata, particularly transparency and ethics, in areas of the global South that are underserved by AI. A user study (n=43) and a participatory session (n=30) were conducted to achieve this goal. The results showed that AI models can encode bias and amplify stereotypes. To promote inclusivity, a community-led strategy is proposed to collect and curate representative data for responsible AI design.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
