Constraints for precise and accurate fluid inclusion stable isotope analysis using water-vapour saturated CRDS techniques
Therese Weissbach, Tobias Kluge, St\'ephane Affolter, Markus C., Leuenberger, Hubert Vonhof, Dana F.C. Riechelmann, Jens Fohlmeister,, Marie-Christin Juhl, Benedikt Hemmer, Yao Wu, Sophie F. Warken, Martina, Schmidt, Norbert Frank, Werner Aeschbach

TL;DR
This study refines a laser spectroscopy method for analyzing water isotopes in speleothem fluid inclusions, establishing constraints for precision and accuracy crucial for paleoclimate research.
Contribution
It introduces optimized constraints and validation procedures for water-vapour saturated CRDS techniques in fluid inclusion isotope analysis.
Findings
Precision improves with water amount above 1 μl.
Measurement accuracy better than 0.08 permil for δ18O.
Reproducibility is within 0.5 permil for δ18O.
Abstract
Hydrogen (2H) and oxygen (18O) isotopes of water extracted from speleothem fluid inclusions are important proxies used for paleoclimate reconstruction. In our study we use a cavity ring-down laser spectroscopy system for analysis and modified the approach of Affolter et al. (2014) for sample extraction. The method is based on crushing of small sub-gram speleothem samples in a heated and continuously water-vapour purged extraction line. The following points were identified: Injection of reference water shows a precision (1) of 0.4-0.5 permil for 18O values and 1.1-1.9 permil for 2H values for water amounts of 0.1-0.5 l, which improves with increasing water amount to 0.1-0.3 permil and 0.2-0.7 permil, respectively, above 1 l. The accuracy of measurements of water injections and water-filled glass capillaries crushed in the system is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
