The Price of Anarchy of the Asymmetric One-Sided Allocation Problem
Sissi Jiang, Ndiame Ndiaye, Adrian Vetta, Eggie Wu

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the inefficiency (price of anarchy) in asymmetric one-sided allocation problems with multi-unit demand agents, extending previous symmetric results and establishing bounds that depend on the number of agents and items.
Contribution
It introduces a cardinal variant of Probabilistic Serial, proves structural theorems, and derives bounds on the price of anarchy for asymmetric multi-unit demand settings.
Findings
Upper bound of O(√n log m) on price of anarchy.
Lower bound of Ω(√n) for any fair mechanism.
Price of anarchy increases logarithmically with number of items.
Abstract
We study fair mechanisms for the (asymmetric) one-sided allocation problem with m items and n multi-unit demand agents with additive, unit-sum valuations. The symmetric case (m=n), the one-sided matching problem, has been studied extensively for the class of unit demand agents, in particular with respect to the folklore Random Priority mechanism and the Probabilistic Serial mechanism, introduced by Bogomolnaia and Moulin. Under the assumption of unit-sum valuation functions, Christodoulou et al. proved that the price of anarchy is in the one-sided matching problem for both the Random Priority and Probabilistic Serial mechanisms. Whilst both Random Priority and Probabilistic Serial are ordinal mechanisms, these approximation guarantees are the best possible even for the broader class of cardinal mechanisms. To extend these results to the general setting there are two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Economic theories and models
