Tidal capture of stars by supermassive black holes: implications for periodic nuclear transients and quasi-periodic eruptions
M. Cufari, C. J. Nixon, Eric R. Coughlin

TL;DR
This paper uses simulations to show that stars partially disrupted by supermassive black holes gain energy and are ejected rather than captured, challenging previous assumptions about their orbital fate and implications for observed nuclear transients.
Contribution
It demonstrates that tidal interactions alone cannot fully explain repeated stellar disruptions, suggesting alternative mechanisms like dynamical exchange are responsible for star capture.
Findings
Maximum tidal energy loss is about 2.5% of stellar binding energy.
Stars are more likely ejected than captured after partial disruption.
Repeated disruptions imply a different capture mechanism than tides.
Abstract
Stars that plunge into the center of a galaxy are tidally perturbed by a supermassive black hole (SMBH), with closer encounters resulting in larger perturbations. Exciting these tides comes at the expense of the star's orbital energy, which leads to the naive conclusion that a smaller pericenter (i.e., a closer encounter between the star and SMBH) always yields a more tightly bound star to the SMBH. However, once the pericenter distance is small enough that the star is partially disrupted, morphological asymmetries in the mass lost by the star can yield an \emph{increase} in the orbital energy of the surviving core, resulting in its ejection -- not capture -- by the SMBH. Using smoothed-particle hydrodynamics simulations, we show that the combination of these two effects -- tidal excitation and asymmetric mass loss -- result in a maximum amount of energy lost through tides of $\sim…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
