Joint Action is a Framework for Understanding Partnerships Between Humans and Upper Limb Prostheses
Michael R. Dawson, Adam S. R. Parker, Heather E. Williams, Ahmed W. Shehata, Jacqueline S. Hebert, Craig S. Chapman, Patrick M. Pilarski

TL;DR
This paper proposes modeling human-prosthesis interactions as joint action systems, comparing controllers to enhance understanding and collaboration in upper limb prostheses.
Contribution
It introduces a joint action framework to analyze prosthesis controllers, offering new insights and recommendations for improving human-machine collaboration.
Findings
Different controllers exhibit distinct joint action characteristics.
The joint action perspective reveals new ways to interpret prosthesis control systems.
Recommendations for enhancing collaborative communication between humans and prostheses.
Abstract
Recent advances in upper limb prostheses have led to significant improvements in the number of movements provided by the robotic limb. However, the method for controlling multiple degrees of freedom via user-generated signals remains challenging. To address this issue, various machine learning controllers have been developed to better predict movement intent. As these controllers become more intelligent and take on more autonomy in the system, the traditional approach of representing the human-machine interface as a human controlling a tool becomes limiting. One possible approach to improve the understanding of these interfaces is to model them as collaborative, multi-agent systems through the lens of joint action. The field of joint action has been commonly applied to two human partners who are trying to work jointly together to achieve a task, such as singing or moving a table…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
