Detection, Explanation and Filtering of Cyber Attacks Combining Symbolic and Sub-Symbolic Methods

TL;DR

This paper explores combining symbolic and sub-symbolic methods to improve explainability and reduce false positives in graph neural network-based cybersecurity intrusion detection systems.

Contribution

It introduces a novel approach that integrates symbolic knowledge with GNNs to enhance explainability and trust in cybersecurity alerts.

Findings

Generated intuitive explanations for diverse scenarios.

Reduced false positive alerts by 66%.

Achieved a 93% reduction when including the fidelity metric.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) on graph-structured data has recently received deepened interest in the context of intrusion detection in the cybersecurity domain. Due to the increasing amounts of data generated by monitoring tools as well as more and more sophisticated attacks, these ML methods are gaining traction. Knowledge graphs and their corresponding learning techniques such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with their ability to seamlessly integrate data from multiple domains using human-understandable vocabularies, are finding application in the cybersecurity domain. However, similar to other connectionist models, GNNs are lacking transparency in their decision making. This is especially important as there tend to be a high number of false positive alerts in the cybersecurity domain, such that triage needs to be done by domain experts, requiring a lot of man power. Therefore, we are addressing Explainable AI (XAI) for GNNs to enhance trust management by exploring combining symbolic and sub-symbolic methods in the area of cybersecurity that incorporate domain knowledge. We experimented with this approach by generating explanations in an industrial demonstrator system. The proposed method is shown to produce intuitive explanations for alerts for a diverse range of scenarios. Not only do the explanations provide deeper insights into the alerts, but they also lead to a reduction of false positive alerts by 66% and by 93% when including the fidelity metric.