The limitations of comonotonic additive risk measures: a literature review
Samuel Solgon Santos, Marcelo Brutti Righi, Eduardo de Oliveira Horta

TL;DR
This paper reviews the limitations of comonotonic additive risk measures, highlighting their incompatibility with key properties and demonstrating they cannot be surplus invariant, thus challenging their applicability in certain contexts.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of the incompatibilities of comonotonic additive risk measures with fundamental properties and introduces new insights using the Choquet representation.
Findings
Comonotonic additive risk measures are incompatible with certain central properties.
Such risk measures cannot be surplus invariant.
The paper highlights limitations in the applicability of these measures.
Abstract
Risk measures satisfying the axiom of comonotonic additivity are extensively studied, arguably because of the plethora of results indicating interesting aspects of such risk measures. Recent research, however, has shown that this axiom is incompatible with central properties in specific contexts. In this paper, we present a literature review of these incompatibilities. In addition, we use the Choquet representation of comonotonic additive risk measures to show they cannot be surplus invariant.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
