The Prediction of Anyons: Its History and Wider Implications
Gerald A. Goldin

TL;DR
This paper reviews the historical development of anyon prediction, highlights recent experimental breakthroughs, and discusses the importance of accurate attribution in scientific progress, especially for marginalized groups.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive historical overview of anyon prediction and emphasizes the social implications of scientific attribution practices.
Findings
Prediction of anyons predates Wilczek, originating in 1977 and 1980-81.
Experimental creation of anyonic excitations occurred in 2020.
Misattribution in scientific discoveries harms diversity and progress.
Abstract
Prediction of ``anyons'', often attributed exclusively to Wilczek, came first from Leinaas & Myrheim in 1977, and independently from Goldin, Menikoff, & Sharp in 1980-81. In 2020, experimentalists successfully created anyonic excitations. This paper discusses why the possibility of quantum particles in two-dimensional space with intermediate exchange statistics eluded physicists for so long after bosons and fermions were understood. The history suggests ideas for the preparation of future researchers. I conclude by addressing failures to attribute scientific achievements accurately. Such practices disproportionately hurt women and minorities in physics, and are harmful to science.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
