Pearl Causal Hierarchy on Image Data: Intricacies & Challenges
Matej Ze\v{c}evi\'c, Moritz Willig, Devendra Singh Dhami and, Kristian Kersting

TL;DR
This paper explores the application of Pearl's Causal Hierarchy to image data, highlighting the complexities and challenges faced when integrating causality theories into computer vision tasks.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how Pearl's Causal Hierarchy can be understood in the context of image data, revealing key intricacies and challenges.
Findings
Identifies specific challenges in applying Pearl's causality to image data
Provides insights into the intricacies of causal reasoning in computer vision
Highlights the need for ground truth benchmarks in causal image analysis
Abstract
Many researchers have voiced their support towards Pearl's counterfactual theory of causation as a stepping stone for AI/ML research's ultimate goal of intelligent systems. As in any other growing subfield, patience seems to be a virtue since significant progress on integrating notions from both fields takes time, yet, major challenges such as the lack of ground truth benchmarks or a unified perspective on classical problems such as computer vision seem to hinder the momentum of the research movement. This present work exemplifies how the Pearl Causal Hierarchy (PCH) can be understood on image data by providing insights on several intricacies but also challenges that naturally arise when applying key concepts from Pearlian causality to the study of image data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCognitive Science and Mapping
