Is pluralism in the history of mathematics possible?
Jacques Bair, Alexandre Borovik, Vladimir Kanovei, Mikhail G. Katz,, Semen S. Kutateladze, Sam Sanders, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia, Mark van, Atten
TL;DR
This paper discusses the possibility of pluralism in the history of mathematics, engaging with current debates and criticisms within Leibniz scholarship.
Contribution
It offers a response to recent criticisms, contributing to the debate on pluralism in the historiography of mathematics.
Findings
Addresses criticisms of Leibniz scholarship
Supports pluralism in mathematical history
Engages with current historiographical debates
Abstract
Leibniz scholarship is currently an area of lively debate. We respond to some recent criticisms by Archibald et al.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.