A brief note on the Bayesian D-optimality criterion
Alen Alexanderian

TL;DR
This paper provides a straightforward derivation showing that in finite-dimensional Bayesian linear inverse problems with Gaussian assumptions, the D-optimal design criterion aligns with minimizing the posterior covariance's log-determinant, aiding experimental design.
Contribution
It offers a simple, generic derivation of the equivalence between Bayesian D-optimality and minimizing the posterior covariance determinant, applicable to finite and potentially infinite-dimensional problems.
Findings
Derivation confirms the equivalence in finite-dimensional cases.
Framework is adaptable to infinite-dimensional inverse problems.
Clarifies the mathematical foundation of Bayesian D-optimality.
Abstract
We consider finite-dimensional Bayesian linear inverse problems with Gaussian priors and additive Gaussian noise models. The goal of this note is to present a simple derivation of the well-known fact that solving the Bayesian D-optimal experimental design problem, i.e., maximizing the expected information gain, is equivalent to minimizing the log-determinant of posterior covariance operator. We focus on finite-dimensional inverse problems. However, the presentation is kept generic to facilitate extensions to infinite-dimensional inverse problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimal Experimental Design Methods · Statistical Methods and Inference · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
