Settling the Reward Hypothesis
Michael Bowling, John D. Martin, David Abel, Will Dabney

TL;DR
This paper rigorously analyzes the reward hypothesis, clarifying the conditions under which goals and purposes can be represented as reward maximization in reinforcement learning.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive framework specifying the implicit requirements for the reward hypothesis to hold, moving beyond simple affirmation or refutation.
Findings
Defines explicit conditions for the reward hypothesis validity
Clarifies the relationship between goals and reward signals
Establishes a formal framework for analyzing goal representation
Abstract
The reward hypothesis posits that, "all of what we mean by goals and purposes can be well thought of as maximization of the expected value of the cumulative sum of a received scalar signal (reward)." We aim to fully settle this hypothesis. This will not conclude with a simple affirmation or refutation, but rather specify completely the implicit requirements on goals and purposes under which the hypothesis holds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science
