On Event Individuation for Document-Level Information Extraction
William Gantt, Reno Kriz, Yunmo Chen, Siddharth Vashishtha, Aaron, Steven White

TL;DR
This paper questions the suitability of template filling for document-level information extraction, highlighting challenges in event individuation that impact dataset quality, evaluation metrics, and model learning.
Contribution
It critically examines the assumptions behind template filling for document-level IE and discusses the implications of event individuation difficulties.
Findings
Human annotators disagree on event boundaries
Template filling metrics may not reflect true understanding
Datasets for document-level IE have quality issues
Abstract
As information extraction (IE) systems have grown more adept at processing whole documents, the classic task of template filling has seen renewed interest as benchmark for document-level IE. In this position paper, we call into question the suitability of template filling for this purpose. We argue that the task demands definitive answers to thorny questions of event individuation -- the problem of distinguishing distinct events -- about which even human experts disagree. Through an annotation study and error analysis, we show that this raises concerns about the usefulness of template filling metrics, the quality of datasets for the task, and the ability of models to learn it. Finally, we consider possible solutions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
