Digitizing SU(2) Gauge Fields and What to Look Out for When Doing So
Tobias Hartung, Timo Jakobs, Karl Jansen, Johann Ostmeyer, Carsten, Urbach

TL;DR
This paper explores various digitization methods for SU(2) gauge fields, analyzing their efficiency and transitions, with a focus on finite subgroups and innovative discretization approaches suitable for quantum and tensor network simulations.
Contribution
It introduces new discretization strategies for SU(2) gauge fields, including a generalized Fibonacci spiral, and examines their effectiveness and phase transitions in the context of quantum computing.
Findings
Fibonacci spiral discretization is highly efficient and near optimal.
Identified a freezing transition at weak couplings.
Compared multiple finite subgroup discretizations for SU(2).
Abstract
With the long term perspective of using quantum computers and tensor networks for lattice gauge theory simulations, an efficient method of digitizing gauge group elements is needed. We thus present our results for a handful of discretization approaches for the non-trivial example of SU(2), such as its finite subgroups, as well as different classes of finite subsets. We focus our attention on a freezing transition observed towards weak couplings. A generalized version of the Fibonacci spiral appears to be particularly efficient and close to optimal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Physics and Python Applications · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
