Comparing two cohomological obstructions for contextuality, and a generalised construction of quantum advantage with shallow circuits
Sivert Aasn{\ae}ss

TL;DR
This paper compares two cohomological methods for detecting quantum contextuality, shows their limitations, and introduces a generalized construction to demonstrate quantum advantage with shallow circuits.
Contribution
It provides an abstract framework comparing cohomological approaches to contextuality and generalizes a construction for quantum advantage using shallow circuits.
Findings
Cech cohomology does not fully characterize contextuality.
The algebraic structure of Pauli and Weyl operators is key to understanding contextuality.
A systematic method to produce quantum advantage with shallow circuits from contextuality examples.
Abstract
We present two results on the subject of quantum contextuality and cohomology, and non-locality and quantum advantage with shallow circuits. Abramsky et al. showed that a range of examples of quantum contextuality is detected by a cohomological invariant based on \v{C}ech cohomology. However, the approach does not give a complete cohomological characterisation of contextuality. A different cohomological approach to contextuality was introduced by Okay et al. Their approach exploits the algebraic structure of the Pauli operators and their qudit generalisations known as Weyl operators. We give an abstract account of this structure, then generalise their approach to any example of contextuality with this structure. We prove at this general level that the approach does not give a more complete characterisation of contextuality than the \v{C}ech cohomology approach. Bravyi, Gosset, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
