TL;DR
This paper introduces MCFair, a novel fair ranking algorithm that accounts for relevance uncertainty, jointly optimizing fairness and user utility, and demonstrating superior performance over existing methods.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new fairness-aware ranking algorithm that incorporates relevance uncertainty and provides a gradient-based optimization approach.
Findings
MCFair effectively balances fairness and utility in ranking.
Empirical results show MCFair outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
Theoretical proof confirms the optimality of the gradient-based approach.
Abstract
Ranking systems are ubiquitous in modern Internet services, including online marketplaces, social media, and search engines. Traditionally, ranking systems only focus on how to get better relevance estimation. When relevance estimation is available, they usually adopt a user-centric optimization strategy where ranked lists are generated by sorting items according to their estimated relevance. However, such user-centric optimization ignores the fact that item providers also draw utility from ranking systems. It has been shown in existing research that such user-centric optimization will cause much unfairness to item providers, followed by unfair opportunities and unfair economic gains for item providers. To address ranking fairness, many fair ranking methods have been proposed. However, as we show in this paper, these methods could be suboptimal as they directly rely on the relevance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsAttentive Walk-Aggregating Graph Neural Network
