Understanding the limits of remote focusing
Sharika Mohanan, Alexander D. Corbett

TL;DR
This paper investigates the residual spherical aberration in remote focusing microscopes, demonstrating how a correction collar can compensate for it, and analyzes the limits imposed by inherent aberrations on system performance.
Contribution
It provides an experimental validation of aberration compensation using a correction collar and analyzes the fundamental limits of remote focusing due to inherent aberrations.
Findings
Correction collar effectively compensates residual spherical aberration.
Residual aberrations are consistent with optical model predictions.
Inherent aberrations limit the diffraction-limited range of remote focusing systems.
Abstract
It has previously been demonstrated in both simulation and experiment that well aligned remote focusing microscopes exhibit residual spherical aberration outside the focal plane. In this work, compensation of the residual spherical aberration is provided by the correction collar on the primary objective, controlled by a high precision stepper motor. A Shack-Hartmann wave front sensor is used to demonstrate the magnitude of the spherical aberration generated by the correction collar matches that predicted by an optical model of the objective lens. The limited impact of spherical aberration compensation on the diffraction limited range of the remote focusing system is described through a consideration of both on-axis and off-axis comatic and astigmatic aberrations, which are an inherent feature of remote focusing microscopes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques · Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Optical Coatings and Gratings
