Might the 2PN perihelion precession of Mercury become measurable in the next future?
Lorenzo Iorio

TL;DR
This paper assesses the potential measurability of Mercury's 2PN perihelion precession with upcoming and current missions, analyzing its magnitude, sources, and the current experimental uncertainties in detecting such subtle effects.
Contribution
It provides a detailed calculation of Mercury's 2PN perihelion precession and evaluates the prospects of detecting it with future spacecraft data.
Findings
2PN precession ranges from -18 to -4 microarcseconds per century
Current measurement uncertainty is about 8 microarcseconds per century
Future missions like BepiColombo could improve constraints on relativistic parameters
Abstract
The Hermean average perihelion rate , calculated to the second post-Newtonian (2PN) order with the Gauss perturbing equations and the osculating Keplerian orbital elements, ranges from to microarcseconds per century , depending on the true anomaly at epoch . It is the sum of four contributions: one of them is the direct consequence of the 2PN acceleration entering the equations of motion, while the other three are indirect effects of the 1PN component of the Sun's gravitational field. An evaluation of the merely formal uncertainty of the experimental Mercury's perihelion rate recently published by the present author, based on 51 years of radiotechnical data processed with the EPM2017 planetary ephemerides by the astronomers E.V. Pitjeva and N.P. Pitjev, is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlanetary Science and Exploration · Astro and Planetary Science · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
