Describing realizable Gauss diagrams using the concepts of parity or bipartate graphs
Alexei Lisitsa, Viktor Lopatkin, and Alexei Vernitski

TL;DR
This paper critiques recent parity-based criteria for realizable Gauss diagrams, providing counterexamples, and establishes that bipartite graphs offer a correct framework for their characterization.
Contribution
It corrects previous parity-based descriptions and proves that bipartite graphs accurately characterize realizable Gauss diagrams.
Findings
Parity-based conditions are insufficient for realizability.
Counterexamples disprove previous parity criteria.
Bipartite graphs correctly characterize realizable Gauss diagrams.
Abstract
Two recent publications describe realizable Gauss diagrams using conditions stating that the number of chords in certain sets of chords is even or odd. We demonstrate that these descriptions are incorrect by finding multiple counter-examples. However, the idea of having a parity-based description of realizable Gauss diagrams is attractive. We recall that realizability of Gauss diagrams as touch curves can be described via bipartite graphs. We show that realizable Gauss diagrams can be described via bipartite graphs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Visualization and Analytics · Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques · Data Management and Algorithms
