In-Season Crop Progress in Unsurveyed Regions using Networks Trained on Synthetic Data

TL;DR

This study develops a neural network-based method to estimate crop progress in unsurveyed regions using synthetic data combined with surveyed data, enabling regional crop monitoring without extensive ground truth data.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel approach that combines synthetic crop progress data with surveyed data to train neural networks for remote sensing-based crop progress estimation in unsurveyed regions.

Findings

Synthetic data improves neural network performance by 8.7% F1 score.

Performance in unsurveyed regions is within 21% of surveyed-region models.

Combining surveyed and synthetic data enhances crop progress estimation accuracy.

Abstract

Many commodity crops have growth stages during which they are particularly vulnerable to stress-induced yield loss. In-season crop progress information is useful for quantifying crop risk, and satellite remote sensing (RS) can be used to track progress at regional scales. At present, all existing RS-based crop progress estimation (CPE) methods which target crop-specific stages rely on ground truth data for training/calibration. This reliance on ground survey data confines CPE methods to surveyed regions, limiting their utility. In this study, a new method is developed for conducting RS-based in-season CPE in unsurveyed regions by combining data from surveyed regions with synthetic crop progress data generated for an unsurveyed region. Corn-growing zones in Argentina were used as surrogate 'unsurveyed' regions. Existing weather generation, crop growth, and optical radiative transfer models were linked to produce synthetic weather, crop progress, and canopy reflectance data. A neural network (NN) method based upon bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory was trained separately on surveyed data, synthetic data, and two different combinations of surveyed and synthetic data. A stopping criterion was developed which uses the weighted divergence of surveyed and synthetic data validation loss. Net F1 scores across all crop progress stages increased by 8.7% when trained on a combination of surveyed region and synthetic data, and overall performance was only 21% lower than when the NN was trained on surveyed data and applied in the US Midwest. Performance gain from synthetic data was greatest in zones with dual planting windows, while the inclusion of surveyed region data from the US Midwest helped mitigate NN sensitivity to noise in NDVI data. Overall results suggest in-season CPE in other unsurveyed regions may be possible with increased quantity and variety of synthetic crop progress data.