Tangent functional connectomes uncover more unique phenotypic traits

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that tangent functional connectomes, derived through non-Euclidean geometry projections, significantly improve individual identification rates over traditional FCs, especially when using correlation distance and optimal regularization.

Contribution

The paper introduces the use of tangent space projections of FCs to enhance fingerprinting accuracy, revealing the importance of regularization and geometric references in improving identification.

Findings

Tangent-FCs yield higher identification rates than regular FCs.

Correlation distance in tangent-FCs outperforms other metrics.

Regularization and parcellation granularity influence fingerprinting accuracy.

Abstract

Functional connectomes (FCs) contain pairwise estimations of functional couplings based on pairs of brain regions activity. FCs are commonly represented as correlation matrices that are symmetric positive definite (SPD) lying on or inside the SPD manifold. Since the geometry on the SPD manifold is non-Euclidean, the inter-related entries of FCs undermine the use of Euclidean-based distances. By projecting FCs into a tangent space, we can obtain tangent functional connectomes (tangent-FCs). Tangent-FCs have shown a higher predictive power of behavior and cognition, but no studies have evaluated the effect of such projections with respect to fingerprinting. We hypothesize that tangent-FCs have a higher fingerprint than regular FCs. Fingerprinting was measured by identification rates (ID rates) on test-retest FCs as well as on monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Our results showed that identification rates are systematically higher when using tangent-FCs. Specifically, we found: (i) Riemann and log-Euclidean matrix references systematically led to higher ID rates. (ii) In tangent-FCs, Main-diagonal regularization prior to tangent space projection was critical for ID rate when using Euclidean distance, whereas barely affected ID rates when using correlation distance. (iii) ID rates were dependent on condition and fMRI scan length. (iv) Parcellation granularity was key for ID rates in FCs, as well as in tangent-FCs with fixed regularization, whereas optimal regularization of tangent-FCs mostly removed this effect. (v) Correlation distance in tangent-FCs outperformed any other configuration of distance on FCs or on tangent-FCs across the fingerprint gradient (here sampled by assessing test-retest, Monozygotic and Dizygotic twins). (vi)ID rates tended to be higher in task scans compared to resting-state scans when accounting for fMRI scan length.