Analysis of electrical resistance data from Snider et al., Nature $\underline{586}$, 373 (2020)
Dale R. Harshman, Anthony T. Fiory

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the temperature-dependent electrical resistance data from a 2020 study, revealing asymmetric serrations at high pressure and discussing their implications for understanding superconductivity.
Contribution
It provides a detailed reanalysis of published resistance data, highlighting features that may influence interpretations of high-pressure superconductivity phenomena.
Findings
Asymmetric serrations observed at 267 GPa in zero magnetic field
No serrations detected at lower pressures or under magnetic field
A step of approximately 16% in the smooth resistance data
Abstract
Digital data for the temperature dependence of electrical resistance, which were extracted and analyzed by Hamlin (arXiv:2210.10766v1) from the pdf file published for "Room temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride," show asymmetric serrations in data for 267 GPa in zero magnetic field that comprise smooth and digitized parts. Further analysis shows that the smooth part exhibits a step at the transition of ~16% in magnitude relative to the data. Notably, there is no evidence of asymmetric serrations in extracted data for lower pressures (184-258 GPa) or for 267 GPa in an applied magnetic field (1-9 T). Several questions are raised, the answers to which would help toward resolving these outstanding issues.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEarthquake Detection and Analysis · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
