Designing Human-Centered Algorithms for the Public Sector: A Case Study of the U.S. Child-Welfare System
Devansh Saxena

TL;DR
This paper explores how to design human-centered algorithms for the U.S. Child Welfare System, focusing on improving decision-making, understanding systemic disparities, and supporting caseworkers through empirical studies and practical insights.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive analysis of human-algorithm interaction in public sector decision-making and proposes actionable guidelines for designing more effective, context-aware algorithms.
Findings
Caseworkers' interactions with algorithms influence decision quality.
Casenotes reveal systemic constraints and invisible labor.
Human-centered design improves algorithmic support for discretionary work.
Abstract
The U.S. Child Welfare System (CWS) is increasingly seeking to emulate business models of the private sector centered in efficiency, cost reduction, and innovation through the adoption of algorithms. These data-driven systems purportedly improve decision-making, however, the public sector poses its own set of challenges with respect to the technical, theoretical, cultural, and societal implications of algorithmic decision-making. To fill these gaps, my dissertation comprises four studies that examine: 1) how caseworkers interact with algorithms in their day-to-day discretionary work, 2) the impact of algorithmic decision-making on the nature of practice, organization, and street-level decision-making, 3) how casenotes can help unpack patterns of invisible labor and contextualize decision-making processes, and 4) how casenotes can help uncover deeper systemic constraints and risk factors…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
