Beyond circular-arc graphs -- recognizing lollipop graphs and medusa graphs
Deniz A\u{g}ao\u{g}lu \c{C}a\u{g}{\i}r{\i}c{\i}, Onur, \c{C}a\u{g}{\i}r{\i}c{\i}, Jan Derbisz, Tim A. Hartmann, Petr Hlin\v{e}n\'y,, Jan Kratochv\'il, Tomasz Krawczyk, Peter Zeman

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of recognizing specific classes of intersection graphs called $H$-graphs, establishing NP-hardness for certain cases and polynomial algorithms for others, including lollipop graphs.
Contribution
It narrows the complexity gap for recognizing $H$-graphs by proving NP-hardness when $H$ contains two cycles and providing polynomial algorithms for recognizing lollipop graphs.
Findings
Recognition of $H$-graphs is NP-hard when $H$ contains two cycles.
Polynomial-time recognition algorithms exist for lollipop graphs.
Recognition of medusa graphs is NP-complete.
Abstract
In 1992 Bir\'{o}, Hujter and Tuza introduced, for every fixed connected graph , the class of -graphs, defined as the intersection graphs of connected subgraphs of some subdivision of . Recently, quite a lot of research has been devoted to understanding the tractability border for various computational problems, such as recognition or isomorphism testing, in classes of -graphs for different graphs . In this work we undertake this research topic, focusing on the recognition problem. Chaplick, T\"{o}pfer, Voborn\'{\i}k, and Zeman showed, for every fixed tree , a polynomial-time algorithm recognizing -graphs. Tucker showed a polynomial time algorithm recognizing -graphs (circular-arc graphs). On the other hand, Chaplick at al. showed that recognition of -graphs is -hard if contains two different cycles sharing an edge. The main two results of this work…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
