What's Wrong with the Absolute Trajectory Error?
Seong Hun Lee, Javier Civera

TL;DR
This paper introduces Discernible Trajectory Error (DTE), a new metric for evaluating camera trajectory accuracy that is less sensitive to outliers than the traditional Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE).
Contribution
The paper proposes DTE and DRE metrics that better reflect trajectory accuracy in the presence of outliers, along with a calibration method for camera-to-marker rotation.
Findings
DTE effectively discerns trajectory accuracy despite outliers.
DRE provides a reliable rotation error measure similar to DTE.
Calibration method improves metric computation accuracy.
Abstract
One of the limitations of the commonly used Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) is that it is highly sensitive to outliers. As a result, in the presence of just a few outliers, it often fails to reflect the varying accuracy as the inlier trajectory error or the number of outliers varies. In this work, we propose an alternative error metric for evaluating the accuracy of the reconstructed camera trajectory. Our metric, named Discernible Trajectory Error (DTE), is computed in five steps: (1) Shift the ground-truth and estimated trajectories such that both of their geometric medians are located at the origin. (2) Rotate the estimated trajectory such that it minimizes the sum of geodesic distances between the corresponding camera orientations. (3) Scale the estimated trajectory such that the median distance of the cameras to their geometric median is the same as that of the ground truth. (4)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Advanced Vision and Imaging · Image and Object Detection Techniques
