$^{176}$Lu$^+$ clock comparison at the $10^{-18}$ level via correlation spectroscopy
Zhang Zhiqiang, Kyle J. Arnold, and Rattakorn Kaewuam, and M. D., Barrett

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a highly precise comparison between two $^{176}$Lu$^+$ optical clocks using correlation spectroscopy, achieving a fractional frequency difference uncertainty at the 10^{-18} level, and accurately measuring the quadratic Zeeman coefficient.
Contribution
The work introduces a novel correlation spectroscopy method for comparing $^{176}$Lu$^+$ clocks, achieving unprecedented precision and detailed measurement of the quadratic Zeeman effect.
Findings
Fractional frequency difference of $(-2.0 ext{±}3.7_ ext{stat} ext{±}0.9_ ext{sys}) imes 10^{-18}$ between two clocks.
Quadratic Zeeman coefficient measured as $-4.89264(88) ext{Hz/mT}^2$.
Fractional frequency uncertainty contribution of $2.5 imes 10^{-20}$ at 0.1 mT magnetic field.
Abstract
We experimentally demonstrate agreement between two Lu frequency references using correlation spectroscopy. From a comparison at different magnetic fields, we obtain a quadratic Zeeman coefficient of , which gives a corresponding fractional frequency uncertainty contribution of just for comparisons at typical operating fields of 0.1\,mT. A subsequent comparison with both systems at 0.1\,mT, demonstrates a fractional frequency difference of , where `stat' and `sys' indicate statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Advanced Frequency and Time Standards · Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
