Categoricity for transfinite extensions of modules
Jan Trlifaj

TL;DR
This paper proves that for certain classes of modules, categoricity in large cardinals implies categoricity in all sufficiently large cardinals, and confirms Shelah's Categoricity Conjecture for specific classes of modules.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of categoricity in a big cardinal and a tail of cardinals for deconstructible classes of modules and proves Shelah's Conjecture for classes of roots of Ext.
Findings
Categoricity in a big cardinal implies categoricity in a tail of cardinals.
Confirmed Shelah's Categoricity Conjecture for classes of roots of Ext.
Established equivalence of categoricity conditions for deconstructible classes.
Abstract
For each deconstructible class of modules , we prove that the categoricity of in a big cardinal is equivalent to its categoricity in a tail of cardinals. We also prove Shelah's Categoricity Conjecture for , where is any abstract elementary class of roots of Ext.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
