One for all and all for one: on the role of a conference in a scientist's life
Olesya Mryglod

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the role of the MECO scientific conference in researchers' careers using bibliographic data, highlighting participation patterns and individual impacts within the scientific community.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative case study of a scientific conference, incorporating ego-centric analysis to assess individual contributions and career influence.
Findings
Conference contributes to academic networking and collaboration.
Participation patterns reveal core and newcomer dynamics.
Conference impact varies among individual researchers.
Abstract
The quantitative description of the scientific conference MECO (Middle European Cooperation in Statistical Physics) based on bibliographic records is presented in the paper. Statistics of contributions and participants, co-authorship patterns at the levels of authors and countries, typical proportions of newcomers and permanent participants as well as other characteristics of the scientific event are discussed. The results of this case study contribute to better understanding of the ways of formalization and assessment of conferences and their role in individual academic careers. To highlight the latter, the change of perspective is used: in addition to the general analysis of the conference data, an ego-centric approach is used to emphasize the role of a particular participant for the conference and, vice versa, the role of MECO in the researcher's professional life. This paper is part…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
