Gap Preserving Reductions Between Reconfiguration Problems
Naoto Ohsaka

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational difficulty of approximating reconfiguration problems, introducing a new hypothesis and proving PSPACE-hardness results for Maxmin 3-SAT Reconfiguration, highlighting the complexity of these problems.
Contribution
The paper introduces the Reconfiguration Inapproximability Hypothesis and establishes PSPACE-hardness of approximating Maxmin 3-SAT Reconfiguration under this hypothesis, using novel gap-preserving reductions.
Findings
Reconfiguration problems are PSPACE-hard to approximate under RIH.
A new hypothesis, RIH, is proposed as a reconfiguration analogue of PCP.
Gap-preserving reductions are developed for reconfiguration problems.
Abstract
Combinatorial reconfiguration is a growing research field studying problems on the transformability between a pair of solutions of a search problem. We consider the approximability of optimization variants of reconfiguration problems; e.g., for a Boolean formula and two satisfying truth assignments and for , Maxmin SAT Reconfiguration requires to maximize the minimum fraction of satisfied clauses of during transformation from to . Solving such optimization variants approximately, we may obtain a reconfiguration sequence comprising almost-satisfying truth assignments. In this study, we prove a series of gap-preserving reductions to give evidence that a host of reconfiguration problems are PSPACE-hard to approximate, under some plausible assumption. Our starting point is a new working…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
