Why the equivalence problem for unambiguous grammars has not been solved back in 1966?
Vladislav Makarov

TL;DR
This paper examines the longstanding open problem of determining the equivalence of unambiguous grammars, explaining why earlier proposed methods have not led to a complete solution since 1966.
Contribution
It clarifies the limitations of Semenov's 1966 algorithm based on power series, demonstrating why the equivalence problem remains unsolved.
Findings
Semenov's 1966 algorithm cannot be extended to solve the full equivalence problem.
The equivalence problem for unambiguous grammars remains unresolved due to fundamental limitations.
The paper provides insights into the complexity of grammar equivalence issues.
Abstract
In 1966, Semenov, by using a technique based on power series, suggested an algorithm that tells apart the languages described by an unambiguous grammar and a DFA. At the first glance, it may appear that the algorithm can be easily modified to yield a full solution of the equivalence problem for unambiguous grammars. This article shows why this hunch is, in fact, incorrect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Natural Language Processing Techniques
